Click Here to login!
Get a Quote | Call today! 877.452.2953

Web Fonts

DJ Lesniak - Friday, September 03, 2010
Web fonts have come along way and there is some really great work being done to make it more reliable across many browsers and platforms.

We were using sIFR which is a flash based solution I thought worked pretty well. Then we tried out Cufon which basically renders an SVG version of the font using javascript to display it on the page. Which also seemed to work ok until I had to edit a 10,000 character page that Cufon generated inline styles for. Yes, an inline style for EVERY character! (man that was a headache) 

We also tried @import but that was unreliable on some devices. TypeKit seemed like it was too early and nothing seemed to really stand out as a reliable, easy to implement solution. Until now!

Google is doing some really great development with a handful of fonts that are simple to implement and reliable across all the popular devices being used today. But the library is pretty limited to make it a main solution. I'm sure that will change shortly though.

Then there is WebINK by Extensis.

I have to say, I've been a long time user of Suitcase and was even an active beta tester for the app at one time, so I may be a little biased. But it makes sense for them to rollout their version of how fonts should be implemented on the web since they have years of experience with fonts and font issues. And rollout a solid solution they did!

Think iTunes for fonts.

Font designers will love WebINK like musicians are loving iTunes. They still have a little work to do in pricing and reliability across different devices. But it's a great first start!

What are your thoughts on these solutions and have you seen anything better?


- Friday, April 09, 2010
Our Culture celebrates the idea of the workaholic. We hear about people burning the midnight oil all the time. They pull all-nighters and sleep at the office. It's considered a badge of honor to kill yourself over a project. No amount of work is too much work.

Not only is this workaholism unnecessary, it's dumb. Working more doesn't mean you care more or get more done. It just means you work more. 

Workaholics wind up creating more problems than they solve. First off, working ridiculous hours just isn't sustainable over time. When the burnout crash comes--and it will---it will hit much harder.

Workaholics miss the point, too. Trying to fix problems by throwing sheer hours at them. Trying to make up for intellectual laziness with brute force. This results in inelegant solutions.

They don't look for ways to be more efficient because they actually like working overtime. They enjoy feeling like heroes and getting all the attention that "badge of honor" brings. But they actually end up creating more problems (often unwittingly) just so they can get off on working more.

All too often Workaholics make the people who don't stay late feel inadequate for "merely" working reasonable hours. That leads to guilt and poor morale all around. Plus, it leads to an butt-in-seat mentality---people stay late out of obligation, even if they aren't really being productive.

If all you do is work, you're unlikely to have sound judgments. Your values and decision making wind up skewed. You stop being able to decide what's worth extra effort and what's not. And you wind up just plain tired. No one makes sharp decisions when they're tired.

In the end, Workaholics don't actually accomplish more than non-workaholics. They may claim to be perfectionists, but that just means they're wasting time fixating on inconsequential details instead of moving on to the next task.

Workaholics aren't heroes. They don't save the day, they just use it up. The real hero is already home because she figured out a better way to get things done.

"Rework" Jason Fried & David Heinemeier Hansson